Most people would have viewed it as the most minor slight. Nearly all
experienced leaders would have overlooked it. But the photo of Hosni
Mubarak and the Belgian Foreign Minister, with the sole of Karel De
Gucht’s shoe facing the then Egyptian president, insulted the Arab
leader so much that he had the AFP photographer who took it permanently
banned from the presidential palace.
Stories of heads of state interfering with the work of the media
often crop up in seemingly trivial ways. But these interjections pave
the way for more repressive measures, eventually threatening the
foundations of a free press.
And they’re not just happening overseas: Last week, President-elect
Donald Trump lashed out at the media — specifically NBC — for publishing
unflattering photos of him that show his double chin.
As a candidate, Trump was never shy about conveying his dismay for
conventional media. Now, as the next president, he is poised to threaten
it.
His ongoing rhetoric against the press and threats against specific
outlets may seem novel and bold, especially to his supporters whose
distrust in it has served as a rallying point, but nothing about these
tactics are new. Before even moving into the Oval Office, Donald Trump
has engaged in practices used by strongmen in other countries for
decades — practices upon which more serious crackdowns are built.

0 comments:
Post a Comment